PDA

View Full Version : 2005 Ford Escape


ivtec
04-06-2004, 06:17 AM
SOURCE: Canadian Driver (http://www.canadiandriver.com/roadtest/05escape.htm)

First Drive: 2005 Ford Escape

When it came time to update the Escape, Ford’s best selling compact sport utility vehicle, Ford designers focussed their attention on three guiding principles – "Personality, Performance and Peace of mind".

The new Escape couldn’t be just ‘new and improved’. It had to have more personality, inside and out, better all-wheel drive performance and more capable powertrain choices, and perhaps most importantly, it had to be the safest vehicle in its class.

In the personality department, the new Escape has new headlamps, fog lamps, an egg-crate grille, new front and rear fascias and new alloy wheels. Interior changes include moving the shifter from the steering column to a floor-mounted position on a flow-through console, different (though not particularly attractive) gauges, new seat cushions, fabrics and leather, and more storage spaces.

But personality is about more than just design. It also involves the driving environment and experience. And in this respect, Ford’s designers have made a good thing better. Larger diameter front shocks and a new stabilizer system better absorb road impacts while maintaining the spritely, nimble driving characteristics of the Escape.

During a day of driving that included traversing Montreal’s well-worn freeways and cruising secondary roads in the Eastern Townships during a preview organized for Canadian auto writers, the Escape demonstrated the fun-to-drive personality that it is well known for. But this Escape was less truck-like in its demeanor than earlier models. Although frost heaves and pot-holes were still noticeable and best-to-avoid road hazards, the 2005 Escape provided a much more civilized and comfortable ride. While the roads beat up on the Escape, the Escape did not beat up on its passengers.

Additional sound-absorbing materials have been added to quieten the interior, insulating the cabin from the rumbling beneath the tires, but wind noise is still quite noticeable.

Introduced in 2000, the Ford Escape very quickly became Canada’s best selling compact SUV. Canadians buying the Escape – 18,694 of them in 2003 – were attracted by its compact size, cargo space, responsive driving characteristics, all weather durability – and available V6 power.

If there was any significant negative, it was the base four cylinder engine. Producing just 127 horsepower and 137 pound feet of torque, and available only with a five-speed manual transmission and front-wheel drive, the four-cylinder Escape just couldn’t compete with the Honda CRV and Toyota RAV4 and their new, more powerful four cylinder engines, available automatics and full-time four-wheel drive.

The new 2.3 litre Duratec engine goes a long way to correcting this problem. With 153 hp and 152 lb-ft of torque, the Escape now has enough power with four cylinders to accelerate, pass and pull without feeling strained. Towing capacity with the four cylinder Escape has been increased from 454 kilograms (1,000 pounds) to 680 kg (1,500 lbs.). Under hard acceleration, the inline four responded eagerly and with less noise, though less pep naturally, than the V6.

Power ratings for the V6 are actually down a touch from 2004, at 200 hp and 193 lb-ft of torque, but new liquid-filled engine mounts and a more sophisticated powertrain management module contribute to a smoother idle and better part-throttle response.

The new four cylinder engine is available with both 5-speed manual and 4-speed automatic transmissions, as well as front-wheel drive and Ford’s new ‘intelligent’ four-wheel drive system, replacing the Control Trac II system used in previous years.

The new I-4WD system is fully automatic and does not need to be switched ‘on’, as with Control Trac II. Operating normally in front-wheel drive, the I-4WD system is capable of transferring as much as 99 per cent of traction to the rear wheels if required. The system uses sensors at each wheel and the accelerator to monitor for wheel slippage as often as 200 times per second and can just as quickly shift torque to where it is needed.

The system is completely transparent to the driver. On a mixture of fresh fallen snow mixed into a gooey mess of mud and dirt, the Escape felt sure footed and steady. Whether and how much its I-4WD system intervened to maintain this confident disposition was not apparent.

With three trim levels, two engine options, two transmissions for four cylinder models and a choice of full-time four-wheel drive or front wheel drive, the Escape gives buyers more choices than any of its major competitors.

Prices for the 2005 Escape, which is already on sale, range from $22,795 for the Escape XLS with 2.3 litre engine, manual transmission and front-wheel drive, to $28,195 for the XLT trim level with standard V6, automatic transmission and front-wheel drive, and $35,895 for the fully-loaded Escape Limited 4x4. Four-wheel drive models start at $28,125 for the XLS automatic 4x4.

Standard equipment on the XLS includes 15-inch steel wheels, power door locks and windows, remote keyless entry, tilt steering, auto-off headlights, AM/FM stereo with single disc CD player, and cloth upholstery.

The Escape Limited includes a bag full of comfort and convenience with standard leather seating, power moonroof, heated front seats, 7-speaker premium audio system, fully automatic headlights, trip computer and reverse sensing system. Many of the Limited’s standard features are optionally available with the XLT trim level.

Some of the more significant changes in the 2005 Escape are ones you can’t see. The Escape’s front structure has been upgraded to provide increased protection in offset frontal crashes. New occupant sensing technology can determine whether or not the front passenger seat is occupied and whether the occupant is an adult or child and switch off the air bag if it is empty or a child is present. Dual stage front airbags are capable of deploying at full or partial power depending on the severity of an accident. All five seating positions now have head restraints and three-point safety belts. Anti-lock brakes with brake assist are now standard on all Escape models, while side curtain air bags that protect against side impacts and roll-overs are available on higher trim levels. All this adds up to peace of mind for buyers and, as expected, a superlative safety rating.

The Escape has undoubtedly been a success for Ford, and in a segment that is fiercely competitive. New and improved compact SUVs are arriving all the time (both Nissan and Hyundai will bring new compact SUVs to Canada this year). But thanks to the three Ps – Personality, Performance and Peace of mind – Ford intends to keep the Escape ahead of the competition.

http://www.canadiandriver.com/roadtest/images/05escape_1.jpg
http://www.canadiandriver.com/roadtest/images/05escape_2.jpg
http://www.canadiandriver.com/roadtest/images/05escape_3.jpg
http://www.canadiandriver.com/roadtest/images/05escape_4.jpg
http://www.canadiandriver.com/roadtest/images/05escape_5.jpg
http://www.canadiandriver.com/roadtest/images/05escape_6.jpg
http://www.canadiandriver.com/roadtest/images/05escape_7.jpg
http://www.canadiandriver.com/roadtest/images/05escape_8.jpg

MikeN
04-06-2004, 08:25 PM
[scroll:945eb8e230]http://www.towworld.com/maytruck.jpghttp://www.canadiandriver.com/roadtest/images/05escape_3.jpg[/scroll:945eb8e230]

chinchillax
04-06-2004, 09:05 PM
ehhh....nothing special about that revised Escape.

:shock:

bobrobin
04-06-2004, 10:04 PM
I see they did nothing about the horrible reliability!! That's what needs the most work. And is it just me or from those pictures the back seat looks like it has no leg room? Still one of my favorite qualities of the CR-V over other compact utes is the rear seat leg room.

mau108
04-06-2004, 11:49 PM
same here bob!

we first looked at a rav, couldnt fit in the back seat! iwas like no, this car we aint getting (1st gen rav), next day, went over to honda,, sat in the model car inside, and said yup this is the one
take out the papers!

escape is a really nice looking vehical, but its a damn FORD! and Ford comes with alotta headache..

jeeplikens
04-07-2004, 03:22 PM
Liberty: Hdrm: 40.7 42.1 Shoulder 56.5 56.5 Hip 57.0 47.4 Leg 40.8 37.2
CRVex Hdrm: 38.9 39.1 Shoulder 56.9 56.5 Hip 54.5 53.5 Leg 41.3 39.4
Escape Hdrm: 40.4 39.2 Shoulder 56.3 55.9 Hip 53.4 49.0 Leg 42.7 36.4

Cargo volume: Jeep/69 CRV/72 Escape/69.2

Eventhough the Escape's rear seating looks cramped, it appears the front seats are back as far as they can go. But as you can see above, the insides are close. No one would buy an escape/liberty/v as a people hauler. We have minivans for that. People stick kids in the back who don't complain much about the loss of room. My kids did for about a week (went from a LHS to a Liberty) but the first time we went "wheeling", they loved the "tight" fit.

Varmint
04-07-2004, 07:28 PM
MikeN - That's a riot! :twisted:

The CR-V has a back seat that it outright limo-like. But the Escape does okay with its rear bench. It's nothing like the RAV4 or Forester. Given that these are compact SUVs, I'd have to give the Escape good marks in that area.

autox02altima
04-07-2004, 08:32 PM
Liberty: Hdrm: 40.7 42.1 Shoulder 56.5 56.5 Hip 57.0 47.4 Leg 40.8 37.2
CRVex Hdrm: 38.9 39.1 Shoulder 56.9 56.5 Hip 54.5 53.5 Leg 41.3 39.4
Escape Hdrm: 40.4 39.2 Shoulder 56.3 55.9 Hip 53.4 49.0 Leg 42.7 36.4


There's more to it than just numbers, though. My friend's Pathfinder seems to have a much larger back seat than my 'V. But the seat is way too close to the floor and the rear wheel makes getting in and out sort of a pain. So whatever the numbers may say, it's just not as comfortable as the 'V.

AnuCrv
04-08-2004, 12:49 PM
jeeplikens wrote:
Liberty: Hdrm: 40.7 42.1 Shoulder 56.5 56.5 Hip 57.0 47.4 Leg 40.8 37.2
CRVex Hdrm: 38.9 39.1 Shoulder 56.9 56.5 Hip 54.5 53.5 Leg 41.3 39.4
Escape Hdrm: 40.4 39.2 Shoulder 56.3 55.9 Hip 53.4 49.0 Leg 42.7 36.4



There's more to it than just numbers, though. My friend's Pathfinder seems to have a much larger back seat than my 'V. But the seat is way too close to the floor and the rear wheel makes getting in and out sort of a pain. So whatever the numbers may say, it's just not as comfortable as the 'V.

yea what do those #s really mean. Jack! numbers on paper do not mean anything if the space has an awkward shape and connot be used. Some vehicles have huge room on paper but there is a strut mount in the way so you to put your keyboard on the car seat. how are these figures really derived.

bumpzter
04-08-2004, 01:48 PM
I drove a dark grey metallic XLT for over an hour yesterday. Before you guys run it down, try it. It's wonderful. Comfortable. Quick. Quiet. Looks great. Has all the goodies. All the safety features. Plenty of room. Controls are where they should be. Appeared to be well built to me.

If it were a Honda, I'd own one. :D

mau108
04-08-2004, 02:24 PM
actually
if it had a honda engine and honda tranny like the VUE
id get the escape no doubt!

ive known a few people who have had their escapes die...engine went kaputh..

now ford focus, dont get my started there ;)
every person i know who owns a focus has had their engine die lol (bit exageration but near truth)

jeeplikens
04-08-2004, 02:25 PM
AnuCrv, I know what you mean. Looks also can throw you off too. The Escape looks larger (puffy) than the V or KJ but up close, it's doors are very thin so I know how they can play the numbers game. When things get tight, I go vertical (roof). Or, if I know I'll need the room, I just drive the minivan.

amycope
04-16-2004, 10:17 AM
Before we bought our V, we test drove the Escape, Liberty, Vue, Cherokee, Kia sorrento(sp?), Santa fe, well just about all. The Liberty and Escape had no room in the back for my kids. It was like driving the Ford Focus we were trading in for more room. Out of all we test drove, we thought the Toyota Rav4 and the V had the most leg room for the kids and we even sat in the back to make sure. I'm happy with the V's space.